event67, compared with the platforms you are also looking at
19 head-to-head pages, each with a table where every competitor cell carries the source and the date a person loaded it, and each with a section on where the other product is the better purchase. Most of these comparisons are not contests, and the pages say which parts are.
What event67 is, before any of these comparisons make sense
event67 is a branded conference companion app for iOS, Android and the web, paired with an organizer console, billed per attendee who actually shows up. It is not a full event management suite. It does not sell tickets, take payment from attendees, print badges, stream video, run a call for papers or do exhibitor lead retrieval.
That sentence decides most of the pages below. Against another attendee app, a comparison is a genuine contest and the table is the argument. Against a full suite, it is not: those products do things event67 has no equivalent for, and the honest page is one that scopes the overlap narrowly and says where the suite wins. Against a ticketing platform it is not a comparison at all, which is why those products get a page under Alternatives explaining how the two fit together and no head-to-head page here.
The commercial difference is more consistent than the feature one.10 of the 19 vendors compared here publish no list price at all, and 9 publish figures we can quote with a link and a date. event67 publishes its rate, its free tier and a hard ceiling on what a single event can cost, and every page below repeats them in the same place.
Every head-to-head comparison
Sorted by product name, across 3 vendor categories. The pricing column says whether that vendor publishes a figure we can cite, because on this market that is the single most useful thing to know before a call.
| Comparison | Category | Publishes a price | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| event67 vs Accelevents | full-suite event management | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Bizzabo | full-suite event management | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Brella | networking & matchmaking | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Cvent | full-suite event management | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Eventee (eventee.co) | attendee app | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs EventMobi | full-suite event management | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Guidebook | attendee app | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Map Your Show | full-suite event management | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Momentus Technologies | full-suite event management | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Nunify | full-suite event management | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Personify A2Z Events | full-suite event management | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Sched (sched.com) | attendee app | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Stova | full-suite event management | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Swapcard | full-suite event management | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs vFairs | full-suite event management | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Webex Events | full-suite event management | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Whova | full-suite event management | No, quote only as at the verified date | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Yapp | attendee app | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
| event67 vs Zuddl | full-suite event management | Yes, on its own pricing page | 3 September 2026 |
Every one of these has a matching switching page under Alternatives, written for a reader who has already decided to move rather than one still weighing it up.
How to read the table on each page
Each comparison table has eight rows and three columns, and every cell in the competitor column carries the URL it came from and the date a person loaded that URL. The rows are the same on every page — pricing model, published price points, free tier, whether the app can ship under your own store listing, published set-up or lead time, the vendor's own feature list, the scope they publish, and attendee platforms.
Two of those rows are worth reading carefully. Published price points reproduces only what the vendor states on its own pricing page, in the vendor's own units, which are frequently not the same units as ours: a per-seat annual licence, a per-event floor and a per-activated- attendee meter cannot be laid side by side as if they were the same number, and each page says so in the same breath as the figures. Published set-up or lead time is blank for most vendors, because most do not publish one; where a vendor documents a real window we quote it, and event67 publishes no figure of its own rather than inventing one.
There are no ticks and crosses, no colour coding, no green-versus-red and no logos. A comparison table styled to make one column look like a win is doing persuasion rather than reporting, and on this subject the reporting is the persuasion.
All third-party names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification only. event67 is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any company named on these pages. Comparison details are accurate as at the dates shown.
What it costs
- Free up to 50
- activated attendees, on one live event
- $5
- per activated attendee beyond 50
- $4,750
- the most one event can ever cost, whatever happens past 1,000
Activated means the person claimed their invite and opened the app. Not when you import them, not when the invite is delivered, and not if they register and stay home.
Questions people actually ask
What is the difference between these pages and the alternatives pages?
The reader is at a different stage. A comparison page is for someone still deciding, so it is symmetric: a table, a section on where the other product wins, a section on where event67 wins, and the pricing on each side. An alternatives page is for someone who has already decided to move, so it leads with what switching involves and what it costs.
Do you show a price for both products?
Only where both publish one. event67 publishes its rate, its free tier and its per-event ceiling. Most of the vendors on these pages publish nothing at all, and where that is true the page says so in those words and links to their pricing page. We never estimate a competitor price, and we never compute what a competitor would charge for a given room.
Why is there no seat field on the competitor side of the pricing block?
Because drawing one would mean computing a total for a product whose price is often not published. A picture of a cost carries the same weight as stating it, so the competitor column carries only the figures that vendor publishes itself, each with a source and a date, and nothing that looks like arithmetic we have done on their behalf.
Do you mark these pages up with ratings or reviews?
No. There is no review or aggregate-rating structured data anywhere on these pages, for event67 or for anyone else, and no star ratings, badge images or review-site widgets appear in the page either. Ratings move, and a stale rating is a false factual claim about a competitor.
How current is this?
Every page shows the date its source record was verified. Pricing and product status are re-checked every 60 days, and within five business days of learning that a vendor has changed pricing. Capability claims are re-checked every 90 days. A claim that cannot be re-verified is removed from the page rather than left sitting there.
Keep reading
If you have already decided to move
Start with the closest comparisons
Or start with the product
Compare it against your own event
One live event, up to 50 activated attendees, with the whole feature set and the full branded theme. No card.