Feedback collected while the room is still warm
Session feedback in event67 is a rating and an optional comment, asked from inside the session screen an attendee already has open. Results land in the organizer console per session, alongside the free-text suggestions attendees send straight to the team.
What this looks like in the product
Feedback sits at the bottom of the session an attendee already opened, rather than behind a link in an email.
- Per-session ratings
- A rating and optional comment at the bottom of the session screen the attendee already opened.
- Suggestions channel
- Event-wide free text that reaches the organizer console while the event is running.
- Feedback console page
- Ratings and comments grouped by session, live rather than in a Monday export.
- End-of-event archive
- The Reports page keeps every Q&A question, poll result and photo from the event.
- Email follow-up
- Campaigns and forms in the same console for the survey that has to wait.
The end of a session
- Rate this session
- A comment box, optional
- Send a suggestion to the organizers
- Your rating, editable until the event closes
- Results visible to the organizer, not the room
The real problem with post-event surveys
Every organizer has run the same experiment. The survey goes out on Monday morning, the response rate is somewhere south of embarrassing, and the handful of replies are from the two people who loved it and the one who did not.
The cause is not survey design. It is that the memory of a specific session has a short half-life, and by Monday an attendee cannot separate the good Tuesday breakout from the mediocre Wednesday panel. Asking later gets you an opinion about the event; asking in the room gets you an opinion about the session, which is the thing a programme committee can act on.
The counter-argument is real and worth stating: attendees stop opening the app the moment the event ends, so anything you defer to the app after the fact will not be answered. Both things are true at once. The workable shape is in-app while people are present, then email for anything you genuinely need after they have gone home, and event67 does both from the same console rather than making you buy a second tool for the second half.
How it works
The attendee rates the session they are in
The prompt lives at the bottom of the session detail screen, under the speaker and the room, so it is reached by scrolling rather than by navigating.
They add a comment, or do not
A rating with no comment is still a data point, and making the comment optional is what keeps the rating count high enough to mean anything.
Suggestions go to the team separately
There is a second, event-wide channel for the things that are not about one session: the room was cold, the coffee ran out, the wifi died in the west hall. These reach the organizer console as they are sent.
The organizer reads it per session, live
The Feedback page in the console groups ratings and comments by session while the event is still running, which is early enough to move a repeat session to a bigger room.
What the organizer gets out of it
- A rating per session, not per event
- Which is the granularity a programme committee argues at. An event score of four out of five tells you nothing about which speaker to re-invite.
- Free-text you can act on during the event
- Suggestions arrive live rather than in a Monday export, so the fixable operational complaints are fixable while the event is still on.
- An end-of-event archive
- The Reports page keeps every Q&A question, poll result and photo from the event, so the feedback sits next to the rest of the evidence rather than in a separate spreadsheet.
- A follow-up channel
- Email campaigns and forms in the same console, for the longer survey that genuinely has to wait until people are home.
What this is not
event67 collects session feedback. It is not a survey platform, and a survey platform is what some of these searches are actually looking for.
- No branching or conditional survey logic. A rating and a comment is the shape.
- No continuing-education or CME credit tracking, and no certificates generated from attendance or a passing score. This is a hard gate for accredited association programmes and it is worth checking before anything else.
- No sentiment analysis or automated theming of free text. You read the comments.
- No anonymous mode that hides the respondent from the organizer, because the organizer already knows their roster.
- No net promoter score dashboard, benchmarking, or comparison against other organizations' events.
The general-purpose forms builder in the console is more flexible than the session rating and can collect longer structured responses, but it collects responses rather than payments, and it does not do branching either.
Where this matters most
Multi-track conferences with a competitive call for sessions, where the ratings decide next year's programme. Internal training and enablement events, where the sponsor of the budget wants to know which sessions landed. Any recurring event where the same speakers come back and somebody has to decide which ones.
It matters less at an event with four sessions and a single track, where the organizer can simply ask people at the bar and get a better answer.
Last updated
What it costs
- Free up to 50
- activated attendees, on one live event
- $5
- per activated attendee beyond 50
- $4,750
- the most one event can ever cost, whatever happens past 1,000
Activated means the person claimed their invite and opened the app. Not when you import them, not when the invite is delivered, and not if they register and stay home.
Questions people actually ask
When is the best time to ask for session feedback?
In the session or immediately after it, while the attendee still has the app open and still remembers which room they were in. Deferring to a next-day email trades a specific answer for a general one, and it also collides with the fact that attendees stop opening event apps once they are home. Ask in the room for the session, and email later only for the questions that genuinely need distance.
Can attendees leave feedback anonymously?
Ratings and comments are attached to the attendee, because the organizer invited them and already holds their roster. There is no anonymous mode. If you need genuinely anonymous responses for a sensitive internal topic, use a dedicated anonymous survey tool for that question and keep the in-app feedback for the sessions.
Does this issue certificates or track continuing-education credits?
No. There is no CEU, CME or PDH tracking, no attendance-based credit, and no certificate generation anywhere in event67. Accredited association and medical programmes should treat this as a firm no rather than a roadmap conversation.
Can I export the feedback?
The Reports page produces an end-of-event archive of the Q&A, polls and photos alongside the feedback, so you leave with the record rather than a login you have to keep paying for.
Does collecting feedback cost extra?
No. Feedback, ratings and suggestions are part of every event including the free one. The meter counts activated attendees: 50 free, $5 each after that, and never more than $4,750 for a single event.
Keep reading
Features that pair with this
Event types that lean on this
See it in your own event
Your first 50 attendees are free on every event, so the smallest version of this costs nothing to try.